Systems and methods for generating receipts

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods for electronically processing accounts receivable (AR) check transactions via a location-base device associated with a merchant. The location-base device, such as a point-of-sale (POS) device, can be configured to perform various functions that facilitate processing of AR checks. Such functions may include improved user interface, an ability to handle a repetitive input parameter, an ability to handle multiple merchant identifiers, an ability to generate multiple receipt types, an ability to edit check transactions, an ability to manage throughput of the device, and an ability to allow scanning of different types of checks so as to allow subsequent processing of the scanned checks to be different based on the type of the check. The location-base device configured in one or more of the foregoing manner facilitates a check authorization process performed by a check processing service.

BACKGROUND

1. Field

The present teachings generally relate to processing of financialtransactions and in particular, relates to processing of accountsreceivable checks via location-base devices.

2. Description of the Related Art

Check transactions between customers and merchants can be categorized asa face-to-face transaction or a non-face-to-face transaction. A customerpaying for a purchase with a check at a store is one example of theface-to-face transaction. In a non-face-to-face transaction, as the termimplies, the customer does not hand the check to the merchant in person.Instead, the customer may mail the check or deposit the check in someform of a “dropbox” associated with the merchant, thereby allowing themerchant to receive the check without meeting the customer. Checkpayments received in such a manner is typically referred to as accountsreceivable (AR) payments.

Frequently, a merchant that receive AR checks also has a location-basedevice such as a point-of-sale (POS) device, and consequently utilizethe POS device to electronically process the AR checks. Because the ARchecks are non-face-to-face transactions in nature, they are subject todifferent processing criteria than the face-to-face check transactions.Thus, if the AR checks are processed via conventional POS devices, themerchant needs to perform additional tasks to facilitate electronicprocessing of the AR checks through devices that are configured forface-to-face check transactions. Such tasks can be tedious and timeconsuming to the merchant. Thus, there is an ongoing need for animproved approach to the manner in which AR checks are processed via thelocation-base device associated with the merchant.

SUMMARY

Various aspects of the present teachings relate to systems and methodsfor electronically processing accounts receivable (AR) checktransactions via a location-base device associated with a merchant. Thelocation-base device, such as a point-of-sale (POS) device, can beconfigured to perform various functions that facilitate processing of ARchecks. Such functions may include improved user interface, an abilityto handle a repetitive input parameter, an ability to handle multiplemerchant identifiers, an ability to generate multiple receipt types, anability to edit check transactions, an ability to manage throughput ofthe device, and an ability to allow scanning of different types ofchecks so as to allow subsequent processing of the scanned checks to bedifferent based on the type of the check. The location-base deviceconfigured in one or more of the foregoing manner facilitates a checkauthorization process performed by a check processing service.

One aspect of the present teachings relates to a system forelectronically processing a check transaction involving a merchant. Thesystem comprises a point-of-sale device that electronically converts acheck. The point-of-sale device is capable of generating a receipt. Thesystem further comprises a check processing service linked to thepoint-of-sale device to receive information about the converted checkfrom the point-of-sale device and perform an authorization process onthe check transaction such that the check processing service notifiesthe merchant via the point-of-sale device of an authorize or declinedecision of the authorization process. The point-of-sale devicegenerates a receipt if the check transaction is authorized and the checktransaction involves a face-to-face transaction. The point-of-saledevice does not generate a receipt if the check transaction involves anaccounts receivable check transaction even if the accounts receivablecheck transaction is authorized by the check processing service.

In one embodiment, the point-of-sale device converts the check byscanning the check so as to read the check's magnetic ink characterrecognition line and obtain an image of at least a portion of the check.In one embodiment, the point-of-sale device facilitates thedetermination of whether the check is an accounts receivable check byhaving the merchant select an option that allows processing of theaccounts receivable check.

In one embodiment, the authorization process includes a risk assessmentof the check transaction. In one embodiment, the check processingservice performs the authorization process and notifies the merchant ofits decision in a manner that depends at least on a level of servicesubscribed by the merchant. The level of service includes the checkprocessing service guaranteeing or purchasing check transactions itauthorizes thereby assuming at least some of the risk associated withthe check.

Another aspect of the present teachings relates to a method forprocessing a check transaction via a point-of-sale device associatedwith a merchant. The method comprises converting a check associated withthe check transaction. The method further comprises determining whetherthe check is an accounts receivable check. The method further comprisescommunicating with a check processing service that determines whetherthe check transaction should be authorized or declined based at least oninformation obtained from conversion of the check. The method furthercomprises determining whether to generate a receipt for the checktransaction. The receipt is not generated if the check is an accountsreceivable check.

In one implementation, converting the check comprises scanning the checkso as to read the check's magnetic ink character recognition line andobtain an image of at least a portion of the check. In oneimplementation, determining whether the check is an accounts receivablecheck comprises providing the merchant with an option to process thecheck as an accounts receivable check such that the merchant selectingthe option is indicative that the check is an accounts receivable check.

In one implementation, the check processing service determines whetherto authorize or decline the check transaction by performing a riskassessment of the check transaction. In one implementation, the checkprocessing service performs the authorization process and notifies themerchant of its decision in a manner that depends at least on a level ofservice subscribed by the merchant. The level of service includes thecheck processing service guaranteeing or purchasing check transactionsit authorizes thereby assuming at least some of the risk associated withthe check.

Yet another aspect of the present teachings relates to a system forconducting a financial transaction involving a merchant. The systemcomprises a location-base device that processes the financialtransaction. The location-base device is capable of generating a receiptassociated with the financial transaction. The system further comprisesa financial transaction processing service linked to the location-basedevice to receive information about the financial transaction andperform an authorization on the financial transaction. The location-basedevice does not generate a receipt if the financial transaction occursin a non-face-to-face manner even if the financial transaction isauthorized.

In one embodiment, the financial transaction comprises a checktransaction. In one embodiment, the location-base device comprises apoint-of-sale device. The point-of-sale device converts the check byscanning the check so as to read the check's magnetic ink characterrecognition line and obtain an image of at least a portion of the check.In one embodiment, the point-of-sale device facilitates thedetermination of whether the check transaction occurred in anon-face-to-face manner by having the merchant select an option thatallows processing of non-face-to-face check transactions.

In one embodiment, the financial transaction processing servicecomprises a check processing service. In one embodiment, the checkprocessing service's performance of the authorization includes a riskassessment of the check transaction. In one embodiment, the checkprocessing service performs the authorization in a manner that dependsat least on a level of service subscribed by the merchant. The level ofservice includes the check processing service guaranteeing or purchasingcheck transactions it authorizes thereby assuming at least some of therisk associated with the check.

Yet another aspect of the present teachings relates to a method forprocessing a payment made to a merchant. The method comprises convertingthe payment into an electronic format that allows at least a portion ofsubsequent payment processing to be performed electronically. The methodfurther comprises determining whether the payment involves anon-face-to-face transaction. A receipt for the payment is not generatedif the payment is a non-face-to-face transaction.

In one implementation, the payment comprises a check. In oneimplementation, converting the check comprises scanning the check so asto read the check's magnetic ink character recognition line and obtainan image of at least a portion of the check. In one implementation,determining whether the payment involves a face-to-face transactioncomprises providing an option for the merchant to select a configurationthat allows processing of non-face-to-face checks.

In one implementation, the method further comprises communicating theelectronic format of the payment to a payment processing service thatperforms an authorization process that includes a risk assessment. Inone implementation, the payment processing service comprises a checkprocessing service.

Yet another aspect of the present teachings relates to a system forconducting a financial transaction involving a merchant. The systemcomprises a first means for determining whether the financialtransaction involves a non-face-to-face transaction. The system furthercomprises a second means for not generating a receipt if the financialtransaction is a non-face-to-face transaction.

In one embodiment, the financial transaction comprises a checktransaction. In one embodiment, the first means includes a point-of-saledevice that electronically converts a check by scanning the check so asto read the check's magnetic ink character recognition line and obtainan image of at least a portion of the check.

In one embodiment, the second means includes an option on thepoint-of-sale device such that, when selected, configures thepoint-of-sale device for processing of non-face-to-face checktransactions. In one embodiment, the point-of-sale device configured forprocessing non-face-to-face transactions does not generate a receipt. Inone embodiment, the second means further comprises having the financialtransaction undergo an authorization process that includes a riskassessment.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of a system configured to conductaccounts receivable (AR) check transactions;

FIGS. 2A-C illustrate various embodiments of a “dropbox” thatfacilitates receiving of non-face-to-face AR check payments;

FIGS. 3A-B illustrate one embodiment of a location-base device adaptedto scan the received AR checks;

FIG. 4 illustrates a process that facilitates user interface of thelocation-base device;

FIGS. 5A-J illustrate processes of various user interface functions thatmay be implemented on the location-base device;

FIG. 6 illustrates a process that obtains information via the userinterface functions and utilizes the information to perform a checktransaction authorization;

FIG. 7A illustrates a process that allows various user interfacingdepending on the result of the check transaction authorization;

FIG. 7B illustrates a block diagram of one possible configuration of thecheck processing service adapted to communicate with merchants andauthorize check transactions;

FIG. 7C illustrates a block diagram of how the check transaction may beauthorized based on information about the merchant and an assessment ofrisk associated with the check;

FIG. 8 illustrates one embodiment of the location-base device configuredto process a plurality of checks having a common parameter such as acommon check amount;

FIG. 9A illustrates a process that utilizes a menu to allow the user toenter a common check amount mode for processing a plurality of checkshaving a common check amount;

FIG. 9B illustrates a process that allows the user to enter the commoncheck amount mode via a menu induced by the check processing service;

FIG. 9C illustrates a process that allows the user to set a defaultcheck amount for the common check amount mode or disable such a mode;

FIG. 9D illustrates a process that allows scanning and processing of theplurality of checks having the common check amount;

FIG. 10 illustrates one embodiment of a system wherein a merchant has aplurality of identifiers, and wherein the check processing service has adatabase that includes different processing configurations associatedwith the different identifiers;

FIG. 11 illustrates an exemplary situation of the system of FIG. 10,wherein different processing configurations can be invoked for differenttypes of check transactions associated with the merchant;

FIG. 12A illustrates a process that utilizes a menu to allow invoking ofa configuration associated with a selected merchant identifier;

FIG. 12B illustrates a process that allows invoking of the configurationassociated with the selected merchant identifier via a menu induced bythe check processing service;

FIG. 13A illustrates one embodiment of the location-base deviceconfigured to display on a display panel a receipt for certain checktransactions;

FIG. 13B illustrates one embodiment of the location-base deviceconfigured to print a receipt for certain check transactions;

FIG. 13C illustrates one embodiment of the location-base deviceconfigured to not generate a receipt for AR check transactions;

FIG. 13D illustrates that one embodiment of the location-device maycomprise a computer based system that uses peripheral devices such as acheck scanner and a printer to process the check transaction and print areceipt;

FIG. 14 illustrates a block diagram of a system that generates aselected receipt associated with the check transaction processing;

FIG. 15A illustrates an exemplary check transaction processing for acheck-warranty type service such that the resulting receipt includes alanguage that reflects the warranty nature of the transaction;

FIG. 15B illustrates an exemplary check transaction processing for anon-warranty type service such that the resulting receipt includes alanguage that reflects the non-warranty nature of the transaction;

FIG. 15C illustrates an exemplary check transaction processing foraccounts receivable conversion (ARC) transactions wherein the receiptmay or may not be generated and wherein the receipt, if generated,includes a language that reflects the ARC nature of the transaction;

FIG. 15D illustrates an exemplary check transaction processing forediting an existing transaction record such that the resulting receiptincludes a language that reflects the edit nature of the transaction;

FIG. 16 illustrates a process that allows selection of the checktransaction processing and thereby the resulting receipt type;

FIGS. 17A-D illustrate one embodiment of the location-base deviceconfigured to allow editing of certain check transactions;

FIGS. 17E-F illustrate another embodiment of the location-base deviceconfigured to allow editing of certain check transactions;

FIG. 18 illustrates a process that allows an amount-change and void editoperations;

FIG. 19A illustrates a process that allows editing of the amount of oneor more check transactions;

FIG. 19B illustrates a process that allows voiding of a checktransaction;

FIG. 20 illustrates one embodiment of a location-base device configuredto allow management of the device's throughput;

FIG. 21 illustrates a process that monitors the device's throughput andnotifies the user if the throughput is affected in a certain manner;

FIGS. 22A-C illustrates various exemplary processes that monitor variousfactors that can affect the device's throughput;

FIG. 22D illustrates an exemplary process that warns the user if abuffer content exceeds a threshold value;

FIGS. 23A-D illustrate a process that prompts the user to upload storedcheck images to the processing service when the image capacity reaches afull level;

FIGS. 24A-B illustrate a process that allows the user to upload thestored check images;

FIG. 25 illustrates one embodiment of a system configured to allow themerchant to scan different types of checks and have the check processingservice process the different types of checks differently therebysimplifying the merchant's task;

FIG. 26A illustrates a process that allows the merchant to scandifferent types of checks with the location-base device;

FIG. 26B illustrates a process that allows the check processing serviceto selectively process electronic files generated by the different typesof checks scanned by the location-base device;

FIG. 27A illustrates an exemplary process that allows the location-basedevice to tag the check transactions as a personal or a non-personalcheck transactions as the merchant scans the different types of checks;and

FIG. 27B illustrates an exemplary process that allows the checkprocessing service to process the check transaction as a personal or anon-personal check transaction based on the tag attached by thelocation-base device.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN EMBODIMENTS

These and other aspects, advantages, and novel features of the presentteachings will become apparent upon reading the following detaileddescription and upon reference to the accompanying drawings. In thedrawings, similar elements have similar reference numerals.

The present teachings generally relate to various aspects of systems andmethods for conducting financial transactions where some form of anon-face-to-face payment is made by a customer to a merchant. It will beunderstood that for the purpose of description, the meaning of thecustomer may include, but is not limited to a person or some form of abusiness entity. Similarly, the merchant may mean a person or some formof a business entity.

Typically, the customer can pay the merchant on a face-to-face or anon-face-to-face transaction. One example of a face-to-face transactionoccurs when a shopper pays for goods at a store by writing a check at aretail store. The shopper hands over the check to a store clerk. Oneexample of a non-face-to-face transaction occurs when a landlord of anapartment complex receives a plurality of rent checks via some form of a“drop-off” box. The landlord may not actually see the renters depositingthe checks in the box.

The “box” in the example above may comprise different embodiments thatare adapted to allow a payment from the customer to be deposited. Thepayment can then be retrieved by the merchant for processing. Paymentsreceived in the foregoing manner is generally referred to as accountsreceivable (AR). One way to process the AR payment is via electronicmeans in a manner similar to, for example, electronic processing ofchecks via a point-of-sale (POS) device. The electronic processing ofthe AR payments is often referred to as accounts receivable conversion(ARC).

Because the payment in the foregoing manner is received where the payermay not be present in a face-to-face transaction, the electronicprocessing of such payments may be subject to processing rules that maybe different than that of the exemplary POS transaction. Various aspectsof the present teachings described herein address various features insystems and methods that advantageously improve a manner in which theARC process is performed.

FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of a system 100 configured tofacilitate electronic processing of checks 120 received by a merchant102 in a non-face-to-face manner—i.e., AR transactions. Although“checks” are used to represent the AR payments in the descriptionherein, it will be appreciated that various features of the presentteachings are not limited to checks. Rather, processing of other formsof paper-based payments, including but not limited to money orders,cashier's checks, and other forms of promissory payments, may benefitfrom at least some of the advantageous features of the presentteachings. Moreover, processing of check-related transactions not basedon paper checks may also benefit from at least some of the advantageousfeatures of the present teachings.

FIG. 1 further illustrates that associated with the merchant 102 is a“box” 122 adapted to receive the checks 122, and a location-base device124 adapted to process the checks retrieved from the box 124. Someexemplary embodiments of the box 122 and the location-base device 124are described below in greater detail.

FIG. 1 further illustrates that the location-base device 124 is linkedto a check processing service 104 via a communication link 106. The link106 may be wire-based, wireless, or any combination thereof. Someexamples of the link 106 include, but not limited to, a telephone basedlink, an internet based link, and other telecommunication links.

FIG. 1 further illustrates that the check processing service 104 can belinked to an automated clearing house (ACH) 110 via a link 112 and/or afederal clearing house (FCH) 114 via a link 116. As is generally known,the ACH 110 typically processes electronic check transactions, and theFCH 114 typically processes paper check transactions.

FIGS. 2A-C now illustrate block diagrams of some possible embodiments ofthe box 122 (FIG. 1) adapted to receive the checks. As shown in FIG. 2A,one embodiment of the box may comprise a mail box 134 associated withthe merchant. It will be understood that the mail box 134 may be on oraway from the merchant's premises. An example of a mail box located awayfrom the merchant comprises a post office box. The mail box 134 receivesa mail 132 that contains a check 130. The check 130 can then beretrieved from the mail box 134 and processed via the location-basedevice 124. The location-base device 124 then generates and sends anelectronic file 136 associated with the check 130 to the checkprocessing service (not shown).

It will be appreciated that the term “electronic file” may comprise anyformat of data that may be used in the art, or in the fields of computertechnology, telecommunication, and the like. Furthermore, the electronicfile may comprise one or more components that are logically linked forthe purpose of providing the functionality intended for the electronicfile.

FIG. 2B illustrates another embodiment of the box comprising a drop box140 associated with the merchant 102. In one embodiment, the drop box140 is located on the merchant's premises, and is adapted to receive thecheck 130. The drop box 140 may comprise an actual physical box, or maysimply comprise a slot defined by an exterior portion of the merchant'spremises such that the check 130 inserted through the slot enters thepremises and be retrievable by the merchant. The check 130 retrievedfrom the drop box 140 can then be processed via the location-base device124 in a manner similar to that described above in reference to FIG. 2A.

FIG. 2C illustrates another embodiment of the box comprising a lock box142 associated with the merchant 102. In one embodiment, the lock box142 is located on the merchant's premises and is adapted to receive thecheck 130. In another embodiment, the lock box 142 may be locatedoutside of the merchant's premises. The lock box 142 may include alocking means to prevent unauthorized access to checks depositedtherein. The check 130 retrieved from the lock box 142 by the merchantcan then be processed via the location-base device 124 in a mannersimilar to that described above in reference to FIG. 2A.

As shown in FIGS. 2A-C, the various AR payments are made with the payerbeing notified that the check will be processed electronically. Innon-AR transactions where the payer is present, the payer typicallyacknowledges and approves electronic processing of the check by asignature. In AR transactions, such a physical signature is notpractical. Thus, submitting a check (AR) after the notice typicallyserves as the payer's authorization to convert and process the checkelectronically. The notice typically also includes an opt-out option forpayers who do not want their checks to be processed electronically. Apayer who opts not to have a check processed electronically typicallyneeds to find an alternate means of providing the payment in a formother than the AR payment. Such foregoing rules on notice for AR checkconversion are generally a result of government and/or industryregulations; and thus may change. Thus, it will be appreciated thatdifferent rules of notice may be applied to the manner in which ARchecks are processed without departing from the spirit of the presentteachings.

As shown in FIG. 2A, a notice 1100 may be sent to the customer (payer)with a statement 1102 as indicated by an arrow 1108. Such notificationmay be suitable for mail-in payment situations where payments are madein response to statements.

One exemplary statement-based notice may include the following language:“NOTICE TO CONSUMER: By (1) submitting your check for payment, and (2)choosing not to exercise your right to OPT-OUT, as specified below, youare authorizing the payee, or its agent, upon receipt of your check, toconvert the check to an electronic payment item or draft and to submitit for payment as an ACH debit entry or draft to your account, inaccordance with the same terms and conditions as your check. You mayOPT-OUT of your choice, authorizing MERCHANT to convert your check forsubmission as an ACH debit entry or draft, by:” followed by an alternatepayment method(s) for opt-out as specified by the merchant.

As further shown in FIG. 2A, a notice 1104 may be also provided to thecustomer as part of an initial contract agreement 1106. Suchnotification may be suitable for mail-in payment situations wherestatements are not issued but payments are made according to the termsof the agreement 1106.

One exemplary agreement-based notice may include the following language:“NOTICE TO CONSUMER: By submitting checks for payment, I agree to andauthorize MERCHANT, or its agent, upon receipt of my checks, to convertthe checks to electronic payment items or drafts and to submit any oneor all of them for payment as ACH debit entries to my account, inaccordance with the same terms and conditions as the checks submitted. Iunderstand that I am entitled to receive a copy of this NOTICE each timeMERCHANT converts any one of my checks for ACH debit entry. Unless Ihave indicated my intent to opt-out, I expressly agree that my one-timereceipt of this NOTICE shall fully satisfy this notice requirement and Iexpressly authorize MERCHANT to submit future checks for paymentreceived from me as ACH debit entries to my account without reissuanceof this notice to me. THIS AUTHORIZATION DOES NOT APPLY IF I HAVEEXERCISED MY RIGHT TO OPT-OUT OF THE ELECTRONIC CONVERSION OF MY CHECKS,PURSUANT TO MERCHANT'S TERMS FOR OPTING-OUT. I DO NOT WAIVE MY RIGHT TORECEIVE FUTURE NOTICE(S) OF MY OPT-OUT RIGHTS.” Such language can befollowed by an alternate payment method(s) for opt-out as specified bythe merchant.

As shown in FIGS. 2B-C, notices 1110 and 1112 may be posted on or aboutthe drop box 140 and the lock box 142, respectively. Such notificationmay comprise a decal with an appropriate language printed thereon.

One exemplary box-posted notice may include the following language:“NOTICE TO CONSUMER: By (1) submitting your check for payment, and (2)choosing not to exercise your right to OPT-OUT, as specified below, youare authorizing the payee, or its agent, upon receipt of your check, toconvert the check to an electronic payment item or draft and to submitit for payment as an ACH debit entry or draft to your account, inaccordance with the same terms and conditions as your check.” Suchlanguage can be followed by an alternate payment method(s) for opt-outas specified by the merchant.

From the foregoing description in reference to FIGS. 2A-C, one can seethat the “box” for receiving AR payments can have differentconfigurations. Thus, it will be appreciated that the receiving box cancomprise any configuration that facilitates a non-face-to-face transferof checks between the customer and the merchant without departing fromthe spirit of the present teachings.

FIGS. 3-7 now illustrate one aspect of the present teachings relating toa manner in which the location-base device 124 can be configured toperform user interface functions that facilitate the ARC processing ofreceived checks. The various user interface functions may be induced bythe location-base device, the check processing service, or somecombination thereof. In the description herein, the term “location-basedevice” may be used interchangeably with “point-of-sale device” (POSdevice). Although the POS device may be considered to be one embodimentof the location-base device, it will be understood that the usage of theterm “POS device” is not intended to limit the scope of the presentteachings in any manner.

It will also be understood that the term “user” and “merchant” may beused interchangeably in the description herein. As an example, it isgenerally more intuitive to refer to a user when describing auser-interface, where the user may be the merchant or anyone associatedwith the merchant. In another example, it is also generally moreintuitive to refer to a merchant when describing a merchant identifier,profile, and the like described below. Thus, the use of either of theseterms is in no way intended to limit the scope of the various aspects ofthe present teachings.

FIGS. 3A-B illustrate one embodiment of an exemplary POS device,exemplifying one possible embodiment of the location-base device 124.The exemplary POS device 124 comprises a display 146 that displays amessage to the user. The POS device 124 further comprises a keypad 150that facilitates an input from the user. The exemplary POS device 124 isadapted to allow scanning of the check 130 so as to facilitateconversion of the check 130 into the electronic file (136 in FIGS.2A-C). The POS device 124 is further adapted to generate a receipt 152in response to the processing of the check 130. Various manners in whichthe receipt 152 can be generated are described below in greater detail.The POS device 124 is also depicted to be linked to the check processingservice (not shown) by a communication link 144. A typical POS devicethat can be incorporated into various systems and methods describedherein is one of the one or more embodiments of the Eclipse® deviceavailable from TeleCheck Services, Inc. of Houston, Tex.

FIG. 3B now illustrates a functional block representation of theexemplary POS device 124 described above in reference to FIG. 3A. ThePOS device 124 comprises a scanning component 162 scans the check 130 soas to obtain information about the check. As is understood in the art,the scanning of the check may comprise obtaining a substantially full orpartial “snippet” images of the check. The scanning process may alsoinclude reading of the check's magnetic ink character recognition (MICR)line imprinted thereon.

In the description herein, the term “scanning” is sometimes used toinclude the imaging (full or partial) operation as well as the MICR linereading. In certain embodiments, the such scanning of the check isinitiated when the check is inserted into the POS device. Theinformation from the MICR along with user input(s) (such as checkamount) are transmitted to the check processing service for theauthorization process. Since the operation process typically does notrely on the check image, and because the check may be declined, thecheck image is not transferred to the processing service for theauthorization request. The check image not being transferred during theauthorization process facilitates a speedy authorization response fromthe processing service. In one embodiment, the check image files arestored in the POS device and transferred subsequently in batch to theprocessing service.

The POS device 124 further comprises an input component 164 thatreceives inputs from the user. In the exemplary POS device depicted inFIG. 3A, the input component comprises the keypad 150. It will beunderstood, however, that the input component may comprise any otherconfiguration that allows the user to input responses, information, andthe like into the POS device 124. For example, the input component maycomprise a touch sensitive screen adapted to respond to the user's touchby hand or some form of a wand. In another example, the input componentmay comprise a voice-based system configured to be responsive to theuser's voice.

The POS device 124 further comprises a display component 166 thatdisplays messages to the user. The message itself may comprise aprompting message requesting the user to do something. The message alsomay comprise an informational message informing the user about someaspect of the transaction being performed. In the exemplary POS devicedepicted in FIG. 3A, the display component comprises the visual display146. It will be understood, however, that the display component maycomprise any means that allows the POS device to convey a message to theuser. For example, the “display” may not necessarily need to be visualin nature, and may comprise alternate means such as audio-based ortouch-based (Braille, for example). It will also be understood that thedisplay component 166 may also comprise touch-based components such as atouch screen that respond to touches by a finger, pointer, and the like.

The POS device 124 further comprises an output component 170 thatgenerates an output in response to some transaction performed. In theexemplary POS device depicted in FIG. 3A, the display componentcomprises a printer that prints the receipt 152. Various manners inwhich the receipt can be generated are described below in greaterdetail.

Although FIG. 3B depicts the display and output components 166, 170separately, it will be appreciated that some of the functionalities ofone component may be implemented via the other component. For example,the printout from the output component may function as a display means.Conversely, a receipt message on the display may be viewed by the payerand confirmed via the input component (keypad, for example) when the POSdevice is being used to perform a face-to-face transaction. Thus, itwill be appreciated that the display and output components 166, 170being depicted and described as separate components is in no wayintended to limit the scope of the present teachings.

As shown in FIG. 3B, the POS device 124 further comprises acommunication component 172 configured to facilitate communicationbetween the POS device 124 and the check processing service (not shown)via the communication link 144. As also shown in FIG. 3B, the POS device124 further comprises a processor 160 that controls, at least to somedegree, various functions of the various components described above. Theprocessor 160 may also perform various processes that facilitate theuser interface functions and other functions for conducting the ARCtransactions described below.

In general, it will be appreciated that the processors comprise, by wayof example, computers, program logic, or other substrate configurationsrepresenting data and instructions, which operate as described herein.In other embodiments, the processors can comprise controller circuitry,processor circuitry, processors, general purpose single-chip ormulti-chip microprocessors, digital signal processors, embeddedmicroprocessors, microcontrollers and the like.

Furthermore, it will be appreciated that in one embodiment, the programlogic may advantageously be implemented as one or more components. Thecomponents may advantageously be configured to execute on one or moreprocessors. The components include, but are not limited to, software orhardware components, modules such as software modules, object-orientedsoftware components, class components and task components, processesmethods, functions, attributes, procedures, subroutines, segments ofprogram code, drivers, firmware, microcode, circuitry, data, databases,data structures, tables, arrays, and variables.

FIG. 4 now illustrates one implementation of a process 180 that can beperformed by the processor (160 in FIG. 3B) to perform user interfacefunctions that facilitate the ARC processing of the received checks. Theprocess 180 begins at a start state 182, and in step 184 that follows,the process 180 induces scanning of a check. In step 186 that follows,the process 180 prompts for and obtains one or more inputs from theuser. In step 190 that follows, the process 180 uses the input(s) thusobtained to facilitate further electronic processing of the scannedcheck. The process 180 ends in a stop state 192.

FIGS. 5A-H now illustrate some of the possible user interface processesthat may be performed in the generalized “prompt and obtain” interfacingstep 186 of FIG. 4. It will be appreciated that the order of thedescription of the various exemplary user interface processes is in noway intended to limit the manner in which these processes are performed.Furthermore, the disclosure of these exemplary processes does not meanthat all of the processes need to be performed. Some of the processesmay not be needed, and thus not performed, in some embodiments of thelocation-base devices. Furthermore, some of the processes may not beneeded, and thus not performed, in certain types of check transactions.It will be appreciated that some or all of these processes may beperformed in any order and in any combination without departing from thespirit of the present teachings.

It will also be appreciated that the user interface processes can betailored to obtain information from the user to satisfy at least some ofthe NACHA (National Automated Clearing House Association) regulations onelectronic processing of AR checks. In one aspect, the various userinterface processes disclosed herein improve the manner in which theuser handles various information about the AR check transaction. Byhaving the location-base device prompt and obtain selected informationfrom the user, the user's job is simplified and the likelihood ofmistake may be reduced. Furthermore, because the device prompts forinformation, processing of checks may be performed by a novice user thatdoes not have extensive experience.

FIG. 5A illustrates one implementation of a user interface process 200that determines if the transaction is a face-to-face transaction. FIG.5A also illustrates how such a process can interface with the user. Inone embodiment, the POS device 124 having the display panel 146 and thekeypad 150 allows the process 200 to display a message 220 on thedisplay panel 146 and receive a user input through the keypad 150.

As shown in FIG. 5A, the process 200 in step 202 prompts for an inputfrom the user to determine if the check transaction is a face-to-facetransaction. Such a prompt may be presented to the user by the exemplarymessage 220 requesting a yes/no response. In step 204 that follows, theprocess 200 obtains the user's input. In one embodiment, the yes/noinput is facilitated by yes/no keys on the keypad 150. The process 200then determines in a decision step 206 whether the transaction is aface-to-face transaction. If the answer is yes, the process 200 in step210 designates the transaction as a face-to-face transaction. Theprocess 200 then subsequently processes the check as a POS transaction.In one implementation of such subsequent processing, the informationassociated with the transaction is tagged as a POS transaction in step212.

If the answer in the decision step 206 is no, the process 200 in step214 designates the transaction as a non-face-to-face transaction. Theprocess 200 then subsequently processes the check as an AR transaction.In one implementation of such subsequent processing, the informationassociated with the transaction is tagged as an AR transaction in step216.

FIG. 5B illustrates another implementation of a user interface process224 that determines the amount of the check scanned. The process 224 instep 226 tags the scanned check as an AR transaction. In step 230 thatfollows, the process 224 prompts the user for the amount indicated onthe check. In one embodiment, such a prompt may comprise a message 222displayed to the user. In step 232 that follows, the process 224 obtainsthe check amount as an input. In one embodiment, such an input may bemade via the keypad 150.

FIG. 5C illustrates another implementation of a user interface process236 that determines the merchant's billing control number (BCN). Inaddition to billing purpose, the BCN may be used to configure the mannerin which the checks are processed at the POS device and/or the checkprocessing service. Such usage of the BCN is described below in greaterdetail.

As shown in FIG. 5C, the process 236 in step 240 tags the scanned checkas an AR transaction. In step 242 that follows, the process 236 promptsthe user for the billing control number. In one embodiment, such aprompt may comprise a message 234 displayed to the user. In step 244that follows, the process 236 obtains the billing control number as aninput. In one embodiment, such an input may be made via the keypad 150.

FIG. 5D illustrates another implementation of a user interface process250 that determines the user's agent identifier. The identifier may beused to configure the manner in which the checks are processed at thePOS device and/or the check processing service. Such usage of the agentidentifier is described below in greater detail.

As shown in FIG. 5D, the process 250 in step 252 tags the scanned checkas an AR transaction. In step 254 that follows, the process 250 promptsthe user for the agent identifier. In one embodiment, such a prompt maycomprise a message 246 displayed to the user. In step 256 that follows,the process 250 obtains the identifier information as an input. In oneembodiment, such an input may be made via the keypad 150.

FIG. 5E illustrates another implementation of a user interface process262 that determines the check transaction identifier. The identifier maybe used to identify and access a previously performed check transactionto perform functions such as editing. Such usage of the transactionidentifier for transaction editing is described below in greater detail.

As shown in FIG. 5E, the process 262 in step 264 prompts the user forthe transaction identifier. In one embodiment, such a prompt maycomprise a message 260 displayed to the user. In step 266 that follows,the process 262 obtains the identifier information as an input. In oneembodiment, such an input may be made via the keypad 150.

FIG. 5F illustrates another implementation of a user interface process274 that determines whether the check is a personal check or anon-personal check. In certain embodiments of the POS device, thepersonal/non-personal nature of the check may be made by the device byreading the check's magnetic ink character recognition (MICR) line. Insuch embodiments, the manner in which various symbols and fields arearranged in the MICR line allows determination of thepersonal/non-personal nature of the check. Thus, the exemplary userinterface process 274 may be implemented in POS devices that do not havethe personal/non-personal nature determination (via MICR) capability.The personal/non-personal check information, obtained in either manner,may be used to determine how the check is processed at the location-basedevice and/or the check processing service. Such usage of the check-typeinformation is described below in greater detail.

As shown in FIG. 5F, the process 274 in step 276 prompts the user todetermine if the check is a personal check. In one embodiment, such aprompt may comprise a message 272 displayed to the user. In step 280that follows, the process 274 obtains the input from the user. In oneembodiment, the input may be made via the yes/no keys on the exemplarykeypad 150. The process 274 then determines in a decision step 282whether the check is a personal check based at least partly on the userinput of step 280. If the answer is yes, the process 274 in step 284designates the check as a personal check. If the answer is no, theprocess 274 in step 286 designates the check as a non-personal check.For the purpose of description herein, non-personal checks may bereferred to as business checks.

FIG. 5G illustrates another implementation of a user interface process292 that determines how old the check is. Such information may be usedto determine how the check transaction is authorized.

As shown in FIG. 5G, the process 292 in step 294 prompts the user toinput the date indicated on the check. In one embodiment, such a promptmay comprise a message 290 displayed to the user. In step 296 thatfollows, the process 292 obtains the input from the user. In oneembodiment, the input may be made via the exemplary keypad 150. Theprocess 292 in step 300 determines the age of the check relative to thedate when the check is being processed. The process 292 then determinesin a decision step 302 whether the check is too old when compared to apredetermined value. If the answer is yes, the process 292 in step 304designates the check as an old check. If the answer is no, the process292 in step 306 designates the check as a current check. It will beappreciated that the age of the check may be classified into morecategories than the two exemplary (old or current) categories withoutdeparting from the spirit of the present teachings. For example, thecheck age category can be graded from “current” (say, 0-60 days old),“old” (61-120 days old), and “very old” (more than 120 days old).

FIG. 5H illustrates another implementation of a user interface process312 that determines whether the check is signed. Such information may beused to determine whether the check should be accepted and processed bythe merchant.

As shown in FIG. 5H, the process 312 in step 314 prompts the user todetermine if the check is signed. In one embodiment, such a prompt maycomprise a message 310 displayed to the user. In step 316 that follows,the process 312 obtains the input from the user. In one embodiment, theinput may be made via the yes/no keys on the exemplary keypad 150. Theprocess 312 then determines in a decision step 320 whether the check issigned based at least partly on the user input of step 316. If theanswer is yes, the process 312 in step 322 designates the check assigned. If the answer is no, the process 312 in step 324 designates thecheck as unsigned.

In certain embodiments, the POS device may be configured to allowconversion of both AR checks submitted in a non-face-to-face manner andchecks presented in person in a face-to-face manner. FIGS. 5I-Jillustrate two exemplary user interface functions that facilitateprocessing of checks in such a POS device.

As shown in FIG. 5I, one embodiment of the POS device 124 may beconfigured to display a processing option on a touch-screen 1120. Theoption may comprise an in-person check conversion option 1122 and an ARCoption 1124. The user may select the option by touching the portion ofthe touch-screen 1120 corresponding to the choice. In one embodiment,the displaying of the in-person/ARC options is triggered when a check isinserted (as depicted by an arrow 1126) into the POS device 124.

FIG. 5I also illustrates an exemplary user interface process 1130 thatallows the user to facilitate processing of AR checks via the POSdevice. The process 1130 in step 1132 provides ARC as an option to theuser. In step 1134 that follows, the process 1130 determines the user'sselection. In a decision step 1136 that follows, the process 1130determines whether the ARC option is selected. If the answer is “yes,”the process 1130 in step 1140 processes the check as an AR conversion.If the answer is “no,” the process 1130 in step 1142 processes the checkas a non-AR conversion.

It will be appreciated that the exemplary in-person option 1122 and theARC option 1124 may be considered as two types of check transactionsprocessed by the POS device 124. Thus, these two options may be thoughtof as two identifiers for the two types of check transactions, andselection of one of the options invokes check processing under thecorresponding identifier. One use for having such an identifier is forkeeping track of how much transactions are performed under the selectedidentifier. The concept of the POS device being configurable to handlemultiple identifiers is described below in greater detail.

FIG. 5J now illustrates an exemplary user interface process 1150 thatmay be implemented after an AR check has been converted by the POSdevice 124 and authorized by the check processing service (not shown).Typically, AR checks processed electronically are not returned to thecustomers. Thus, the process 1150 in step 1152 determines whether the ARcheck conversion and authorization are completed. If completed, theprocess 1150 in step 1154, via the POS device, reminds the merchant todestroy the AR check within a specified period of time. In oneimplementation, the specified period of time is 14 days. As shown inFIG. 5J, such a reminder can be displayed as a message 1144 on the POSdevice 124.

FIGS. 6-7 now illustrate how the various exemplary user interfacefunctions described above can be used to facilitate further processingof the checks received by the merchant. FIG. 6 illustrates a process 330that utilizes at least some of the input(s) obtained by the userinterface function(s) to perform an authorization of the checktransaction. The process 330 begins at a start state 332, and in step334 that follows, the process 330 induces scanning of the check. In step336 that follows, the process 330 induces prompting and obtaining ofinput(s) from the user via the location-base device. In step 240 thatfollows, the process 330 induces performing an authorization of thecheck transaction based at least in part on the information from thescanned check and the input(s). In step 342 that follows, the process330 induces performing of an authorization response to the merchantbased on the result of the performed authorization. The process 330 endsin a stop state 344.

It will be appreciated that in one implementation, the process 330described in reference to FIG. 6 may be performed and coordinated by oneor more processors associated with the check processing service. Inanother implementation, the process 330 may be performed and coordinatedby some combination of one or more processors associated with thelocation-base device and the check processing service.

FIG. 7A illustrates an exemplary process 350 that may be performed bythe check processing service to perform the authorization and selectedinterfacing with the location-base device user. The process 350, in step352, induces performing of the check transaction authorization. In oneimplementation, the check transaction authorization includes a riskassessment of the check transaction in a manner described below ingreater detail.

As shown in FIG. 7A, the process 350 determines in a decision step 354whether the check authorization has resulted in an error. If the answeris yes, the process 350 induces retrying of the transaction. The process350 in state 358 then prompts the merchant to re-enter the input(s). Ifthe answer in the decision step 354 is no, the process 350 in step 360sends a response to the merchant depending on the authorization result.

Some exemplary authorization results are depicted as branches 362, 364,366, 368 that sends different exemplary responses to the merchant. Theexemplary result/response branch 362 comprises step 370, where theprocess 350 has determined that the check transaction has been approved,and that the check can be processed electronically. In step 374 thatfollows, the process 350 induces prompting the user to void the checkvia the POS device. In one embodiment of the POS device, such voiding isaccomplished by inserting the check face up into the device. In step 376that follows, the process 350 induces prompting the user to remove thevoided check from the POS device. In step 380 that follows, the process350 sends an approval code to be displayed on the POS device. In step382 that follows, the process 350 sends a reminder to the user todestroy the check. As previously described, AR converted checks aretypically destroyed by the merchant within a specified period of timeafter the transaction is authorized. The process 350, in state 384, theninduces prompting of the user to return to main menu of the POS device.

As shown in FIG. 7A, the exemplary authorization result/response branch364 comprises step 390, where the process 350 has determined that thecheck itself is approved, but the electronic processing is not offeredfor the approved check. In step 392 that follows, the process 350 sendsan approval notice to the POS device user. In step 394 that follows, theprocess 350 sends an instruction to the user to keep the approved checkfor non-electronic processing. In one implementation, the non-electronicprocessing of the check may comprise the merchant sending the originalpaper check to the check processing service. In another implementation,the merchant may send an image of the check to the check processingservice, and the check may be converted back to paper format at theprocessing service for further processing. Such a concept of having thecheck processing service handle non-electronic checks for ARC checktransactions are described below in greater detail. The process 350, instate 396, then induces prompting of the user to return to main menu ofthe POS device.

As shown in FIG. 7A, the exemplary authorization result/response branch366 comprises step 400, where the process 350 has determined that thecheck transaction is declined. In certain implementation of theauthorization, the first decline decision may be overturned byre-assessment of the check transaction using additional information.Such information may be requested from the merchant, externaldatabase(s), and other sources that facilitate a more detailed riskassessment of the check transaction. The re-assessment of the checktransaction may be triggered if the risk assessed places the check in aborderline area in terms of the check's risk and potential profit. Thusas shown in FIG. 7A, the process 350 in a decision step 402 determinesif the first decline decision is overturnable. If the answer is yes, theprocess 350 in step 404 performs a re-assessment of the checktransaction. The process 350 then determines in a decision step 406whether the first decline decision has been overturned. If the answer instep 406 is yes, the process 350 in step 408 notifies the merchant ofthe approval decision. If the answer in step 406 is no, the process 350sends a decline notice to the merchant. One manner of notifying themerchant of the decline decision is described below in reference to the“no” result in the decision step 402.

If the answer in the decision step 402 (overturnable?) is no, theprocess 350 in step 412 sends the decline notice to the merchant. Asshown in FIG. 7A, the decline decision notification step 412 may beinvoked by the “no” result of the decision step 406 (overturned?). Instep 414 that follows, the process 350 induces notification of themerchant. The process 350 then prompts the merchant to return to the POSdevice's main menu in state 410. As shown in FIG. 7A, the return-to-menustate 410 can also be entered after the merchant notification step 408.

As shown in FIG. 7A, the exemplary authorization result/response branch368 comprises step 420, where the process 350 has determined that theprocessing of the check transaction can benefit from human intervention.In step 422 that follows, the process 350 sends an instruction to themerchant to contact a call service center for the human intervention.The process 350, in state 424, then induces prompting of the user toreturn to main menu of the POS device.

FIG. 7B illustrates one possible embodiment of the check processingservice 104 that processes check transactions. In one embodiment, theprocessing service 104 comprises a gateway-1042 that communicates withthe merchant 102 via the link 106. The gateway 1042 may be configured toreceive electronic information about the various types of financialtransactions input into the location-base device (not shown in FIG. 7B)associated with the merchant 102. The gateway 1042 may also beconfigured to transmit decisions or other information associated withthe service's processing of the financial transaction information.

In general, the gateway 1042 may comprise one or more computers taskedfor allowing communication between the processing service 104 and theplurality of merchants' location-base devices. Such a task may include,but not limited to, routing incoming and outgoing data, providing afirewall that inhibits unauthorized access, and providing a secure linkbetween the processing service 104 and the subscribing merchants (via,for example, encrypted communication link).

The processing service 104 further comprises an authorization component1040 configured to authorize or decline check transactions. In oneembodiment, the authorization component 1040 is configured to authorizeor decline acceptance and processing of AR checks received by themerchant 102 in a manner described herein.

As shown in FIG. 7B, the authorization component 1040 may perform itsauthorization function facilitated by one or more database 1044. Theexemplary database 1044 may comprise a merchant profile database 1046having information about the merchant 102. The database 1044 may alsocomprise a check information database 1050 having information about amagnetic ink character recognition (MICR) line associated with the checkbeing processed. The database 1044 may also comprise a risk managementdatabase 1052 having information that facilitates risk assessment(s)performed by the authorization component 1040 or some other componentassociated with the authorization component 1040. The database 1044 mayalso comprise a negative data database 1054 having information aboutprevious transactions that resulted in a negative disposition.

It will be appreciated that, although the various databases 1046, 1050,1052, 1054 are depicted to be within the database 1044, such arelationship is for descriptive purpose only, and in no way limit themanner in which the databases can be configured. For example, thevarious databases may be part of a single large database. The variousdatabases can also be physically separate from each other, and alsophysically separate from the database 1044. Furthermore, the database1044 may also be physically located outside of the processing service104, and be accessible by the authorization component 1040. Thus, itwill be appreciated that the system of processing service 104 depictedin FIG. 7B is a functional block diagram, and in no way intended tolimit the scope of how such service 104 can be configured.

FIG. 7C illustrates one embodiment of an exemplary authorizationcomponent 1060 that authorizes or declines the check transaction. Asshown in FIG. 7C, the authorization “component” 1060 may comprise acombination of processors, databases, data, programs, and the like.Similar to the databases described above in reference to FIG. 7B, such“parts” of the authorization component 1060 may be integrated at asingle location, located at different locations, or be configured in anypossible combination.

The exemplary authorization component 1060 comprises a processor 1080that accesses information related to the check transaction anddetermines whether to authorize or decline the transaction. In oneimplementation, the processor 1080 accesses the merchant profiledatabase 1046 having information about a plurality of merchants. Forexample, an exemplary merchant “A” has associated with it a profile1062. Such a profile may include merchant name, billing control number,check acceptance level, check transaction edit capability, etc.

The check acceptance level may include several services available tosubscribing merchants, with each service level having a correspondingservice fee. In one implementation, the service level options include abasic approve/decline service where the merchant still assumes the riskeven if the check is approved. The merchant may also choose a warrantyservice where the check processing service guarantees that check willclear if it approves the transaction. In such a service, the checkprocessing service assumes the risk once it approves the check. Themerchant may also choose a check acquisition service where the checkprocessing service buys the checks from the merchant and assumes therisks associated with the checks. It will be appreciated that any of anumber of different service levels can be provided to the merchantwithout departing from the spirit of the present teachings.

As shown in FIG. 7C, the exemplary merchant profile 1062 indicates thatthe exemplary merchant “A” has selected the exemplary warranty service.The profile 1062 also indicates that merchant “A” is capable of editingcheck transactions.

In one implementation, the processor 1080 obtains information about themerchant from the merchant profile database 1046, and uses at least someof that information to perform a risk assessment (indicated by a block1064). Thus, a merchant data input 1072 may be obtained in the foregoingmanner. Other inputs such as a check data input 1066 and a customer datainput 1070 may also be obtained in a similar manner. The exemplary data1066, 1070, and 1072 are depicted to be inputs into a risk engine 1074that performs a risk analysis process and outputs a risk score 1076 thatis indicative of the risk of the check transaction. Other factors suchas the potential profit associated with the processing of the checktransaction may also affect the authorize/decline decision.

FIG. 7C also shows the database 1044 described above in reference toFIG. 7B. Such a database may be accessed by the processor 1080 tofacilitate the risk assessment. As shown in FIG. 7C and described above,the exemplary merchant profile database 1046 may be located anywhere(with respect to the other databases and the check processing service)accessible by the authorization component 1060 without departing fromthe spirit of the present teachings.

In certain implementations, the risk assessment assigns a risk scorebased on various factors associated with the check transaction. Suchfactors can weigh the likelihood that the check will return against thelikelihood that the check will clear. Such balancing of risk of a badcheck against the potential profit for a successful transaction maydepend on factors such as the amount of the check, check writer'shistory, check writing frequency at the time of check submission,location and type of business associated with the merchant, merchant'scheck transaction history, and the like. The check transaction may beapproved if the risk score determined in such a manner is above acertain level. The check transaction can be declined if the risk scoreis below a certain level. In certain implementations, an intermediaterisk score between the “authorize” and “decline” score levels maytrigger an additional risk assessment that assesses the potentiallyprofitable check transaction in greater detail.

FIGS. 8-9 now illustrate one aspect of the present teachings relating tothe location-base device being configurable to allow handling of arepetitive input that may be common to a plurality of checks. FIG. 8illustrates the POS device 124 processing a plurality of checks 430. Forthe purpose of description in reference to FIGS. 8-9, it will be assumedthat the plurality of checks 430 being processed share some commonparameter that is input into the POS device 124. As further shown inFIG. 8, the POS device 124 is linked to the check processing service(not shown) by the communication link 144.

FIGS. 9A and B illustrate two exemplary processes that can cause the POSdevice 124 to enter a common input mode. As illustrated in FIG. 9A, oneexemplary process 440 allows the user to enter the common input mode viathe device's menu. The process 440 induces displaying of the menu instep 442. In step 444 that follows, the process 440 prompts for theuser's selection. In step 446 that follows, the process 440 obtains theuser's selection as an input. As also shown in FIG. 9A, the exemplarydisplay 146 of the exemplary POS device 124 displays an exemplarymessage 454. The message 454 is shown to have an exemplary “common checkamount” option selected. The selection of the option can be facilitatedby the exemplary keypad 150.

The “common check amount” is used as an exemplary common parameter forthe descriptive purpose herein. It will be appreciated, however, thatany other parameter associated with the check transaction (some of whichare described herein) may qualify as a common parameter and be treatedlikewise without departing from the spirit of the present teachings. Theexemplary common check amount parameter can arise, for example, in arental establishment where a plurality of renters have a same rentamount. In such situations, it may be more efficient for the POS deviceuser not to repeatedly enter the same check amount for each of theplurality of checks having the same amount.

As shown in FIG. 9A, the process 440 in step 450 prompts for and obtainsthe common check amount for the plurality of checks. Such prompt andinput may be facilitated by a message 456 displayed on the display panel146. In step 452 that follows, the process 440 instructs the user toscan the plurality of checks having the common check amount. Anexemplary message 460 may facilitate such scanning of checks. As anexample, the message 460 may indicate that the POS device is in a commoncheck amount mode, and at the completion of scanning (and other inputs)of one check, the message may prompt for scanning of the next check, orinform how to exit the common check amount mode. An exemplary loopingprocess that can perform the function of step 452 is described below ingreater detail.

FIG. 9B illustrates another exemplary process 470 that allows the userto enter the common check amount mode. In certain implementations, thecheck processing service may prompt the user with the option of enteringsuch a mode. One way of configuring the merchant's options may beachieved by the merchant's billing control number (BCN) that can beobtained from the merchant via the POS device user interface functiondescribed above in reference to FIG. 5C. Thus, the process 470 in step472 prompts for and obtains the merchant's BCN. Obtaining of the BCN maybe facilitated by a message 486 displayed on the display panel 146. Instep 474 that follows, the process 474 induces displaying and promptingfor a selection from options associated with the BCN. In step 476 thatfollows, the process 470 obtains the user's selection input—in thisexemplary case, the common check amount mode. In step 480 that follows,the process 470 is in the common check amount mode, and prompts for andobtains a common check amount. Obtaining the common check amount may befacilitated by a message 486 requesting the user to enter the checkamount common to the plurality of checks. In step 482 that follows, theprocess 470 instructs the user to scan the plurality of checks havingthe common check amount. An exemplary message 488 may facilitate suchscanning of checks. As an example, the message 488 may indicate that thePOS device is in a common check amount mode, and at the completion ofscanning (and other inputs) of one check, the message may prompt forscanning of the next check, or inform how to exit the common checkamount mode. An exemplary looping process that can perform the functionof step 482 is described below in greater detail.

FIG. 9C illustrates an exemplary process 1160 that allows the user toset a default value for the check amount. Thus, the set default checkvalue may provide the common check amount for one or more checks scannedthereafter. The process 1160 in step 1162 provides a check parametersetup as an option to the user. In step 1164 that follows, the process1160 provides a default check amount as a subsequent option if the checkparameter setup is selected by the user. An exemplary message 1180 canpresent such an option to the user. In step 1166 that follows, theprocess 1160 prompts for and obtains the default amount if the defaultcheck amount option is selected. The process 1160, in a decision step1170, determines is the default amount is $0.00. In one implementation,the default amount of $0.00 can function as a disabling switch thatdisables the default amount prompting during the check conversionprocess. The prompting for the default value and the disabling featurecan be presented to the user by an exemplary message 1182 shown on thedisplay. Thus if the answer is “yes,” the process 1160 in step 1172disables the default amount prompting feature of the POS device. If theanswer is “no,” the process 1174 uses the entered amount as a defaultvalue during the subsequent check conversion(s), until a new defaultvalue is set or the default value feature is disabled. The process 1160in step 1176 returns to a menu or to some state of the conversionprocess with the default check amount value set. The user may beprompted to cause the return by an exemplary message 1184.

FIG. 9D illustrates an exemplary process 1010 that facilitates scanningof the plurality of checks having the same check amount. Thus, theprocess 1010 may occur in steps 452 and 482 of the processes 440 and 470described above in reference to FIGS. 9A-B. The process 1010 may alsooccur after the default check amount is set by the process 1160 asdescribed above in reference to FIG. 9C.

The process 1010 begins in a start state 1012, and in step 1014 thatfollows, the process 1010 induces scanning of one the checks having thesame check amount. In step 1016 that follows, the process 1010 appliesthe common check amount to the scanned check. In step 1020 that follows,the process 1010 prompts for and obtains other input(s). In step 1022that follows, the process 1010 determines whether another check with thesame amount is to be scanned. If the answer is yes, the process 1010loops back to step 1014 where scanning of another check is induced. Ifthe answer in no, the process 1010 in step 1026 returns the POS deviceto the main menu. The process 1010 then ends in a stop state 1030.

FIGS. 10-12 now illustrate one aspect of the present teachings relatingto the merchant's subscription to the check processing serviceconfigurable such that the merchant can be serviced in a plurality ofmanners depending on a plurality of identifiers associated with themerchant. Certain merchants may comprise different facets in theirbusiness, and it may be advantageous to set up the check processingconfigurations differently for the different facets. As an example, amerchant may be involved in a retail sales operation in part of abuilding complex. That merchant may also own that building, and theremainder of the building may be leased or rented to others for businessor personal purposes. Thus, the merchant may receive face-to-face checksin the retail sales operation, and AR checks from the leasees andrenters. The merchant may then decide to have the received checksseparated and processed accordingly, and set up more than oneidentifiers under the subscription to the check processing service. Asone can appreciate, a given merchant's subscription can be divided intomultiple categories in any number of ways. Each of the multiplecategories can then be assigned a identifier, and each assignedidentifier can be advantageously configured to improve the manner inwhich checks are processed.

FIG. 10 illustrates a block diagram 490 wherein an exemplary merchant“A” 492 has a plurality of merchant identifiers 494 a-d denoted as ID1,ID2, ID3, ID4. The multiple identifiers of the merchant 492 may beserviced by one or more location-base devices. As further shown in FIG.10, the merchant 492 is linked to the check processing service 104 viathe link 106. The check processing service 104 is depicted as comprisinga database 500 that includes information about the various subscribingmerchants. Information 502 a about merchant A may include a plurality ofconfigurations to be used, depending on the merchant A's identifier.Thus for example, configurations A1, A2, A3, A4 correspond respectivelyto identifiers ID1, ID2, ID3, ID4.

FIG. 11 illustrates a specific example where each the four exemplaryidentifiers are assigned to preferentially handle selected types ofcheck transactions. The “preferential handling” may be facilitated by asingle POS device wherein a default set of options are loaded into thedevice upon the selection of the identifier. The single POS device maystill allow other functions (not associated with the selectedconfiguration) to be performed via one or more menus. The preferentialconfiguration may also be implemented via a plurality of POS devicesassociated with the merchant, with each device having similar defaultset of preferred options and other selectable functions.

Thus in the exemplary configuration of FIG. 11, merchant A is depictedas having the exemplary identifier ID1 (494 a) associated withconfiguration A1 that preferentially handles face-to-face checks (asindicated by arrow 506 a). Similarly, the ID2 (494 b) is associated withconfiguration A2 that preferentially handles both face-to-face andnon-face-to-face checks (as indicated by arrow 506 b). The ID3 (494 c)is associated with configuration A3 that preferentially handlesnon-face-to-face checks (as indicated by arrow 506 c). The ID4 (494 d)is associated with configuration A4 that preferentially handlesnon-face-to-face checks having common check amounts (as indicated byarrow 506 d). As previously described, these exemplary preferredconfigurations can be implemented via one or more POS devices.

As further illustrated in FIG. 11, the exemplary configurations A1-A4are depicted as being loaded (as indicated by arrows 510 a-d) from thecheck processing service 104 to the one or more POS device at themerchant location. As previously described in reference to FIG. 10, suchexemplary configurations may be stored in the exemplary database 500associated with the check processing service 104, and be invoked by theidentifiers associated with the merchant.

It will be appreciated that the exemplary “in-person” and ARC options,described above in reference to FIG. 51, may also be considered to betwo exemplary identifiers that identify two types of check transactions.As described above, these two options resulted in differentconfigurations for processing of their respective types of checktransactions.

FIGS. 12A and B now illustrate two exemplary processes that allows thePOS device user to enter an identifier that results in the device beingconfigured in a selected manner. In FIG. 12A, a process 520 obtains amerchant identifier via a menu associated with the POS device. Theprocess 520 in step 522 induces displaying of the menu. In step 524 thatfollows, the process 520 prompts for the user's selection. Such aselection prompt may be achieved by an exemplary message 534 (forentering a new identifier) displayed on the display panel 146. In step526 that follows, the process 520 obtains the input from the user. Theuser input may be facilitated by the exemplary keypad 150. In step 530that follows, the process 520 prompts for and obtains a merchantidentifier. Prompting and obtaining of the merchant identifier from theuser may be facilitated by a message 536. In step 532 that follows, theprocess 520 uses the obtained identifier to induce receiving and loadingof a configuration associated with the identifier. The loading of theconfiguration may be visually confirmed to the user by an exemplarymessage 540.

In FIG. 12B, a process 550 obtains a merchant identifier via themerchant's billing control number (BCN). The process 550 in step 552induces prompting for and obtaining the merchant's BCN. Such a promptmay be facilitated by a message 564. In step 554 that follows, theprocess 550 induces displaying of options associated with the BCN. Theprocess 550 further prompts for a selection from the options. In step556 that follows, the process 550 obtains an input from the user. Forthe exemplary process 550, the input would indicate that a merchantidentifier is to be selected. In step 560 that follows, the process 550induces prompting for and obtaining of a merchant identifier. Step 560can be facilitated by a message 566. In step 562 that follows, theprocess 550 uses the obtained identifier to induce receiving and loadingof a configuration associated with the identifier. The loading of theconfiguration may be visually confirmed to the user by an exemplarymessage 568.

FIGS. 13-16 now illustrate one aspect of the present teachings relatingto the location-base device being configurable to allow generation ofdifferent types of receipts in response to various factors associatedwith different check transactions. FIGS. 13A and B illustrate theexemplary POS device 124, showing that a receipt can be generated andoutput in different ways for transactions that issue receipts. Forexample, the display panel 146 of the POS device 124 may display areceipt language 570, and the customer can acknowledge and accept theterms of the receipt via the exemplary keypad 150. Such a receipt outputmethod is typically suitable for face-to-face check transactions wherethe customer can view the receipt language.

In other face-to-face transactions, a hardcopy receipt 152 may be moreappropriate. The receipt 152 may include a receipt language 572 thatdepends on the type of the check transaction. Exemplary factors that canaffect the transaction type, and thus the receipt language, aredescribed below in greater detail.

FIG. 13C illustrates that the POS device 124 that is configured toconvert AR checks may also inform the user about the absence of areceipt for the transaction. An exemplary message 1190 shown on thedisplay panel 146 of the POS device 124 can inform the user that noreceipt is being generated for the converted and processed ARtransaction.

FIG. 13D illustrates that the receipt generation (or no generation forAR transactions) does not necessarily have to be performed by the POSdevice. Moreover, the location-base device having the novel featuresdescribed herein may comprise separate components as depicted in FIG.13D. An exemplary location-base device 580 is depicted as comprising acomputing device 582 coupled to a check scanner 584, a display terminal586, a keyboard 590, and a printer 592. The computing device 582 is alsolinked to the check processing service (not shown) via a communicationlink 594. For the location-base device 580, the different receipts maybe printed via the printer 592.

FIG. 14 illustrates a generalized functional block diagram 600 thatallows selective generation of different types of receipts in responseto various factors 602 associated with the check transaction. As shownin FIG. 14, at least some of the check transaction factors 602 are inputinto the processor 160 of the location-base device. In one embodiment,the processor 160 may obtain a configuration information 604 from thecheck processing service 104 in response to the input factors 602. Theprocessor 160 can determine the type of the check transaction based onthe configuration information 604 and/or the check transaction factors602. The processor 160 then induces a display/printer 612 to generate aselected receipt 610 appropriate for the determined check transactiontype. The processor 160 may also determine that for AR checktransactions, no receipt is to be generated, as indicated by an arrow614. FIG. 14 also shows a database 606 that may be used to store variousreceipt languages and other information needed for the generation of thevarious receipts. It will be understood that the database 606 may bepart of the location-base device, or may be located at any otherlocation that is accessible by the device itself or via the checkprocessing service 104.

FIGS. 15A-D illustrate some exemplary receipts (or no receipts) that canbe generated by the configuration described above in reference to FIG.14. As shown in FIG. 15A, a receipt selection configuration 620comprises the processor 160 receiving exemplary factor inputs 622including (but not limited to) the check amount, scanned checkinformation, billing control number (BCN), and merchant identifier. Inone embodiment, the processor 160 can then access a database 624associated with the check processing service 104 to obtain a processingconfiguration associated with the transaction factors 622. In FIG. 15A,the exemplary processing configuration associated with the BCN and theidentifier comprises a warranty on the checks authorized by the checkprocessing service 104. In one implementation of the authorization, thecheck processing service may offer the merchant a warranty (sometimesalso referred to as guarantee) subscription, where the serviceguarantees the check transactions it authorizes. In one guaranteesubscription, the check processing service assumes the risk of a checkit authorizes. Thus, if the authorized check returns for some reason andthe merchant cannot collect the fund and fees associated with thereturned check, the processing service pays the merchant the equivalentamount. In another guarantee subscription, the check processing servicemay purchase the merchant-received check it authorizes. Thus, theprocessing service assumes the risk of the check and the burden ofcollecting fund if the check returns. It will be appreciated that theaforementioned guarantee subscriptions are exemplary, and the detailsand terms may vary. Moreover, the guarantee subscription may compriseother similar risk/burden-assuming features. Thus, as shown in FIG. 15A,the processor 160 in response to the processing configuration, caninclude a warranty language 626 in a receipt 628 generated by thedisplay/printer 612. As further shown in FIG. 15A, the processor 160may, for non-face-to-face transactions (arrow 616), no receipt is to begenerated.

FIG. 15B illustrates another exemplary processing configuration 630 thatresults in a receipt 636 having a non-warranty language 634. Similar tothe configuration described above in reference to FIG. 15A, theexemplary transaction factors 622 input into the processor 160 can causethe check processing service 104, via the database 624 (where the BCNand identifier invokes non-warranty service), to configure thetransaction as a non-warranty transaction. As further shown in FIG. 15B,the processor 160 may, for non-face-to-face transactions (arrow 638), noreceipt is to be generated.

FIG. 15C illustrates another exemplary processing configuration 640where the processor 160 receives transaction factors 642 that includes atag that indicates that the transaction is an AR transaction and otherfactors as described above in reference to FIGS. 15A-B. In oneembodiment, the processor 160, uses the transaction factors to determinea processing configuration via the database 624 associated with thecheck processing service. The exemplary configuration for the BCN andthe identifier, as depicted in the database 624, causes the processor160 to determine that a receipt is not to be issued for AR transactions.Thus, no receipt is generated for the AR check transaction as indicatedby an arrow 650. If the transaction is a face-to-face type, theprocessor 160 generates a receipt 648 having an appropriate language 646via the display/printer 612.

FIG. 15D illustrates another exemplary processing configuration 660 thatfacilitates generation of a receipt 674 (or no receipt fornon-face-to-face transactions as indicated by an arrow 676) for anediting transaction. The processor 160 is depicted to receive exemplarytransaction factors 662 including a transaction identifier, the BCN, andthe merchant identifier. In one embodiment, the processor 160 uses thetransaction factors 662 to obtain from the check processing service, viathe database 624, an exemplary configuration that allows editing ofselected transactions that already have occurred. The transaction to beedited may be residing within the location-base device as a transaction666, or may be located at the check processing service 104 as atransaction 670. Various manners in which the check transactions can beedited via the location-base device are described below in greaterdetail. Thus, the processor 160 in response to the allowed editingconfiguration, perform the edit for the transaction associated with thetransaction identifier, and may include an edit language 672 in thereceipt 674 (for face-to-face transactions) generated by thedisplay/printer 612.

As shown in FIG. 15D, the processor 160 does not induce generation of areceipt for non-face-to-face transactions (arrow 676). In oneembodiment, the receipt issue/no issue decision is based on the originaltransaction (666 or 670) being edited. If the original transactionissued a receipt, then the corresponding edit transaction also issues anedit receipt. If the original transaction did not issue a receipt, thenthe corresponding edit transaction also does not issue an edit receipt.

In the exemplary processing configurations illustrated in FIGS. 15A-D,and in the generalized configuration in FIG. 14, the processor 160 isdepicted as obtaining the situation-specific configuration from thecheck processing service 104. It will be appreciated that such depictionof the processor-service relationship is in no way intended to limit thescope of the present teachings. The location-base device may include itsown database, or may access a database other than that of the processingservice 104, to obtain similar situation-specific configurations thatfacilitate the generation of different receipts, without departing fromthe spirit of the present teachings.

The various exemplary receipt generation methods for differenttransaction types can be generalized as a process 680 illustrated inFIG. 16. The process 680 in step 682 induces scanning of the check. Instep 684 that follows, the process 680 obtains input(s) from the user,some of which can be used as check transaction factors. In step 686 thatfollows, the process 680 obtains configuration parameter(s) based on thecheck transaction factors. In step 688 that follows, the process 680determines whether to issue a receipt. In step 690 that follows, theprocess 680 determines (if a receipt is to be issued) the type ofreceipt to be generated, based on the check transaction parametersand/or the configuration parameters. In step 692 that follows, theprocess 680 induces displaying and/or printing of a receipt suitable forthe transaction type of the scanned check.

FIGS. 17-19 now illustrate one aspect of the present teachings relatingto the location-base device being configurable to allow editing ofselected check transactions that have been previously processed. FIGS.17A-D illustrate an exemplary manner in which a check transaction can beidentified and accessed for editing. It will be appreciated that thetransaction(s) to be edited may be identified and accessed in any numberof ways without departing from the spirit of the present teachings.

In FIG. 17A, a transaction accessing configuration 700 comprises somecombination of check transaction files held at the POS device 124 and/orthe check processing service 104. Exemplary check transaction files 714a, b, and c at the processing service 104 are respectively denoted astransactions A01, A02, and A03. Exemplary check transaction files 712 a,b, and c at the POS device 124 are respectively denoted as transactions#11, #12, and #13. It will be understood that the foregoing exemplarytransaction files are just that—exemplary, and in no way intended tolimit the manner in which the transaction files are distributed betweenthe POS device 124 and the processing service 104. In someconfigurations, the POS device 124 may not hold any device-completedtransaction files for the purpose of editing; substantially all suchfiles may be held at the processing service 104 temporarily prior tobeing transmitted to the automated clearing house (ACH).

As shown in FIG. 17A, the one or more of the available transaction filescan be accessed via a menu displayed on the display panel 146. Anexemplary message 710 can prompt the user to select the “Edittransaction” option, and the user can select the option via the keypad150.

Once the edit option is selected, FIG. 17B illustrates an editconfiguration 702 where the POS device 124 displays an exemplary optiondisplay 716 listing options among the edit function. One exemplaryoption prompts for the user to enter the identifier of the transactionto be edited. If the subsequently entered transaction identifier doesnot match with any of the available transactions, the POS device 124 maybe configured to display a message indicating such. Another exemplaryoption allows the user to view the identifiers of transactions that areavailable for editing. For the purpose of description, the user isassumed to select the first option that allows the user to input thetransaction identifier.

FIG. 17C illustrates an exemplary transaction selection configuration704 that results from the exemplary user action of FIG. 17B, wherein theuser selects an exemplary transaction identifier A01. For this selectedtransaction, an exemplary menu 720 may comprise “Check availability” and“Cancel” options. For the purpose of description, the user is assumed toselect the “Check availability” option.

FIG. 17D illustrates an exemplary transaction displaying configuration706 that results from the exemplary user action of FIG. 17C, wherein theuser wants to see the availability of the transaction A01. The POSdevice 124 may then compile a list of available transaction from the POSdevice (depicted as a list 726) and the processing service (depicted asa list 724). Such compiled list of available transactions may bedisplayed as a list 722. In the exemplary list 722 of the editabletransactions, the transaction A02 is depicted as being available forediting.

FIGS. 17E-F illustrate another manner in which a check transaction canbe identified and selected for editing. As shown in FIG. 17A, the POSdevice may comprise an Edit key 1212 that activates displaying of a listof editable transactions 1210. The user may scroll up and down the listby scroll keys 1214 and 1216 or by some form of a touch-screen scrollingoptions. Once a transaction is identified, the user may select it byusing the Ent key 1220 or by some form of a touch-screen option.

FIG. 17F shows that once the transaction is selected, additional options1222 for that transaction may be displayed to the user. The optiondisplay 1222 may comprise a change-amount option 1224 and a void option1226. In one embodiment, these edit options 1224 and 1226 are presentedto the user in a touch-screen format, thereby allowing the user to makethe selection by touching the desired option.

FIG. 18 illustrates an editing process 730 that allows the POS deviceuser to edit a check transaction. The check transaction to be edited maybe identified and accessed in the exemplary manner described above inreference to FIGS. 17A-D. The process 730 begins at a start state 732,and in step 734 that follows, the process 730 induces displaying of amenu where “edit” is one of the options. In a decision step 736 thatfollows, the process determines whether the edit option is selected. Ifthe answer is “no,” the process 730 ends in a stop state 754.

If the answer to the decision step 736 is “yes,” the process 730 in step740 induces identifying and accessing of the transaction to be edited.In step 742 that follows, the process 730 determines the type of edit tobe performed from the user. In a decision step 744 that follows, theprocess determines whether the edit comprises a amount-change operation.If the answer is “yes,” the process 730 in step 746 performs theamount-change editing operation. The process 730 then ends in the stopstate 754. If the answer to the decision step 744 is “no,” the process730 further determines in a decision step 750 whether the edit comprisesa void operation. If the answer to the decision step 750 is “yes,” theprocess 730 in step 752 performs the void editing operation. The process730 then ends in the stop state 754. If the answer in the decision step750 is “no,” the process 730 ends in the stop state 754.

It will be appreciated that in the edit process 730, the order ofamount-change determination (step 744) and the void determination (step750) can be interchanged without departing from the spirit of thepresent teachings. The amount-change edit operation (step 746) and thevoid edit operation (step 752) are described below in greater detail inreference to FIGS. 19A and B, respectively.

FIG. 19A illustrates an amount-change edit process 760 that may beperformed in step 746 of the process 730 described above in reference toFIG. 18. The process 760 in step 762 has determined that theamount-change edit operation has been selected. In step 764 thatfollows, the process 760 obtains the change amount from the user. In adecision step 766 that follows, the process 760 determines whether thetransaction record to be edited is held locally in the POS device. Ifthe answer is “yes,” the process 760 in step 770 locates and accessesthe local transaction record. If the answer is “no,” the process 760 instep 772 requests access to the transaction record held at the checkprocessing service.

As shown in FIG. 19A, the process 760 obtains the transaction record,either locally or remotely, and in step 774, performs the amount-changeedit operation. In a decision step 776 that follows, the process 760determines whether a receipt for the edit operation is to be issued. Ifthe answer is “yes,” the process 760 in step 780 displays and/or printsa receipt having details such as transaction identifier, changed amount,approval code, agent identifier, transaction class, and the like. If theanswer is “no” (AR transaction, or not wanted for non-AR transaction),the process 760 skips the receipt generating step 780.

As shown in FIG. 19A, the process 760 then determines whether the useris done with the amount-change editing operation. In certainimplementations, the editing configuration allows the user toamount-change edit multiple check transactions. Thus, if the answer tothe decision step 782 is “no,” the process 760 in step 786 obtainsanother transaction identifier for amount-change operation. The process760 then loops back to step 764 for another amount-change operation. Incertain implementations, the next transaction to be edited may undergoat least some of the transaction availability (for editing)determinations described above in reference to FIGS. 17-18. If theanswer to the decision step 782 is “yes,” the process 760 in step 784returns to menu.

FIG. 19B illustrates a void edit process 790 that may be performed instep 752 of the process 730 described above in reference to FIG. 18. Theprocess 790 in step 792 has determined that the void edit operation hasbeen selected. In a decision step 794 that follows, the process 790determines whether the user wants to void the transaction to cancel thesale. It will be understood that the “sale” may mean sale of goods orservices, or the financial transaction itself. If the answer to thedecision step 794 is “no,” the process 790 in step 812 returns to themenu. If the answer is “yes,” the process 790 in a decision step 796determines whether the transaction record to be edited is held locallyin the POS device. If the answer is “yes,” the process 790 in step 800locates and accesses the local transaction record. If the answer is“no,” the process 790 in step 802 requests access to the transactionrecord held at the check processing service.

As shown in FIG. 19B, the process 790 obtains the transaction record,either locally or remotely, and in step 804, performs the void editoperation. In a decision step 806 that follows, the process 790determines whether a receipt for the edit operation is to be issued. Ifthe answer is “yes,” the process 790 in step 810 displays and/or printsa receipt having details such as transaction identifier, changed amount,approval code, agent identifier, transaction class, and the like. If theanswer is “no” (AR transaction, or not wanted for non-AR transaction),the process 790 skips the receipt generating step 810. The process 790then returns to menu in step 812. In certain implementations, theediting configuration allows the user to void one check transaction perediting session. Thus, in such an implementation, the process 790 doesnot prompt the user for another void operation.

FIGS. 20-24 now illustrate one aspect of the present teachings relatingto the location-base device being configurable to allow managing of thethroughput associated with the device. In certain applications of thelocation-base device, the input rate (into the device) may besufficiently high enough relative to the output rate (out of the device)so as to be potentially problematic. FIG. 20 illustrates a block diagramof one such exemplary check processing situation 820 where the inputrate may be comparable or exceed the output rate. The POS device 124 isdepicted as receiving and processing a plurality of 824 in a relativelyshort time interval. Such a situation may arise, for example, when alandlord receives a plurality of rent checks (AR type) at a specifiedtime of the month and decides to batch-process the checks in onesession. The batch processing utilizes the POS device's resourcedifferently than a use such as that of a retail sale processing, wherechecks are received and processed in a distributed manner over arelatively long period of time. Thus, the POS device's throughputcapability may not be an issue when the POS device is used in non-ARapplications.

As shown in FIG. 20, the plurality of checks 824 are depicted as beingbatch processed, wherein checks are scanned one after another by the POSdevice 124. The device 124 is depicted as comprising the scanner 162that scans the checks, and the processor 160 that coordinates thescanning and subsequent processing of the transaction records associatedwith the scanned checks. The POS device 124 further comprises thecommunication component 172 that facilitates the communication of thePOS device 124 with the check processing service 104.

As shown in FIG. 20, one embodiment of the POS device 124 furthercomprises a buffer component 824 that buffers files associated with theinput check transactions. The buffer 824 may comprise some form of astorage medium that can modulate the input rate to the processor 160.The buffer 824 may also function as a temporary storage area for filesthat are being processed by the processor 160. It will be appreciatedthat the buffer 824 may also comprise other components associated withPOS devices, wherein such components facilitate the “buffering” functionas is generally understood in the art.

Associated with the buffer 824 is a buffer capacity that determines howmuch the buffer 824 can store before it becomes “filled.” In oneembodiment, a buffer level 830, indicative of how “full” the buffer 824is, is monitored by the processor 160. An increasing buffer level 830may indicate that an input rate 826 is greater than an output rate 832associated with the POS device 124. Thus, if the buffer level 830increases beyond some threshold level, the processor may be configuredto trigger an appropriate warning to the user.

As shown in FIG. 20, one embodiment of the POS device 124 furthercomprises the display component 166 that can receive an inform/warncommand 834 from the processor 160 when the throughput of the device 124is affected in some manner. One exemplary situation that may result inthe inform/warn command 834 is when the buffer level exceeds thethreshold level as described above.

In FIG. 20, the input rate 826 is depicted in an exemplary manner as arate of transfer of data from the scanner 162 to the buffer 824. It willbe appreciated, however, that the input rate may include other factorssuch as user inputs and whether the check is imaged in full or partialmanner.

FIG. 21 illustrates a process 840 that monitors the throughput of thePOS device and notifies the user under certain conditions. The process840 begins in a start state 842, and in step 844 that follows, theprocess 840 monitors the throughput of the device. In step 846 thatfollows, the process 840 notifies the user if the throughput is or maybe affected in a certain manner. In a decision step 850 that follows,the process 840 determines if the monitoring/notifying operation isdone. If the answer is “no,” the process 840 loops back to step 844 andrepeats the cycle. Thus, the monitoring/notifying operation may repeatuntil some condition causes the loop to terminate. Such termination ofthe loop may result in the answer being “yes” in the decision step 850,in which case the process 840 ends in a stop state 852.

The throughput of the POS device may be affected by various factors, oneof which is the buffer capacity as described above. FIGS. 22A-Cillustrates some exemplary processes that monitor some of the exemplaryfactors that affect the throughput of the POS device. Some of all of thevarious exemplary processes can be implemented in step 844 of theprocess 840 (FIG. 21) in any combination.

FIG. 22A illustrates a process 860 that monitors the input rate based onthe check scanning operation. The process 860, in step 862, monitors thecheck scan rate. In step 864 that follows, the process 860 estimates theinput rate based on the check scan rate and the sizes of the filesassociated with the scanned checks.

FIG. 22B illustrates a process 870 that monitors the buffer usage of thePOS device in step 872. The buffer usage may be monitored by monitoringthe buffer level as described above in reference to FIG. 20.

FIG. 22C illustrates a process 880 that monitors the output rate of thePOS device based on a transmission rate associated with the POS device.The process 880, in step 882, monitors the transmission rate of thecheck transaction files. In step 884 that follows, the process 880estimates the output rate based on the transmission rate and the size ofthe transaction files being transmitted.

FIG. 22D illustrates an exemplary process 890 that may be performed aspart of step 846 of the process 840 (FIG. 20). The process 890, in step892, warns the user if the buffer level exceeds a threshold value. Sucha triggering event may result from the input rate being greater than theoutput rate for a significant duration. Thus, in one implementation, thebuffer level may collectively represent the input rate, output rate, andthe buffer usage factors.

In certain embodiments of the POS device, the conversion processcomprises scanning of the check. During the scanning operation, thecheck's magnetic ink character recognition (MICR) line is read, and thecheck is imaged either in full or in part(s) (often referred to assnippets). Information from the MICR, along with the check amount(either provided by the user, or confirmed by the user if in defaultamount mode) are used to allow either authorization or decline of thecheck transaction. In these embodiments, the check image is not used bythe check processing service to render a preferably quick decision.Thus, the check image files are stored in the POS device, either in thebuffer or some other storage means, for batch processing later. In oneembodiment, only the check image files corresponding to authorizedtransactions are stored. In another embodiment, substantially all of theconverted image files are stored whether or not the correspondingtransactions are authorized or not. During the batch “uploading,” thecheck image files are transferred to the check processing service forsubsequent processing.

If the stored images occupy the storage beyond a certain level, the POSdevice may not be able to store more images, and thus not be able toconvert more checks until the storage area is cleared in some manner.Thus, one can see that the number of stored images and the storagecapacity can affect the throughput of the POS device.

FIGS. 23-24 illustrate an image uploading feature that may beimplemented in certain embodiments of the POS device to trigger and warnthe user when the device's image holding capacity becomes full. It willbe understood that the term “full” may include situations where thestorage level exceeds a pre-set threshold level thereby providing a“safety” margin.

FIGS. 23A-D illustrate an exemplary monitor and trigger process 1230that monitors the storage level of the images. The process 1230 in step1232 monitors the image capacity (storage level) of the POS device. In adecision step 1234 that follows, the process 1230 determines whether theimage capacity is full. If the answer is “no,” the process 1230 in step1244 returns to a check processing function that may invoke furthermonitoring of the image capacity. If the answer is “yes,” the process1230 in step 1236 prompts the user to decide whether the stored imagesshould be uploaded to the processing service. In one implementation, theuser can decide by a yes/no decision in response to an exemplary prompt1254 (having yes and no touch-screen options 1256 and 1260) depicted inFIG. 23B. Thus, in a decision step 1240 that follows, the process 1230determines whether the user's answer is a yes. If the answer is “yes,”the process 1230 in step 1242 induces batch uploading of the storedimages, thereby making room for subsequent check images. The status ofimage uploading may be presented to the user by an exemplary message1262 depicted in FIG. 23B. The process 1230 then returns to the checkprocessing function in step 1244. If the answer is “no” in the decisionstep 1240, the process 1230 in step 1246 notifies the user of the fullcapacity and the suspension of further check processing. In step 1250that follows, the process 1230 provides the user an option to upload theimages. Then, the process 1230 in state 1252 suspends further checkprocessing until the images are uploaded. The notice/suspension/optionfeatures of steps 1246, 1250, and 1252 may be presented to the user inan exemplary message 1264 having upload now and upload later options1266 and 1270.

FIGS. 24A-B illustrate that the image uploading option does not need tobe triggered by the full-storage condition. In certain embodiments, theuploading of images may be performed any time, via a menu such as anexemplary menu 1290 where an upload images option 1292 is an optionpresented to the user. Thus, an exemplary process 1280 in step 1282provides an option to the user to select image uploading. In step 1284that follows, the process 1280 induces uploading of the stored images ifthe upload option is selected by the user. The process 1280 in step 1286then returns to a check processing function in which it was engaged in.

FIGS. 25-27 now illustrate one aspect of the present teachings relatingto the location-base device and the check processing service beingconfigurable to allow at least some of the check-type selection to beperformed at the processing service, thereby simplifying the manner inwhich the merchant processes a plurality of received checks. FIG. 25illustrates a block diagram of a check-type selection configuration 900wherein the POS device 124 scans a plurality of checks 902. Theexemplary checks 902 being processed by the POS device 124 are depictedas comprising an ACH-processable (“ACH-able”) check A (904 a), anACH-able check B (904 b), a non-ACH-able check C (904 c), a non-ACH-ablecheck D (904 d), and an ACH-able check E (904 e).

As shown in FIG. 25, the POS device 124 may be configured to prompt theuser to scan all checks, thereby allowing the user to process the checks902 without having to decide in advance which checks can and cannot beprocessed via the POS device 124. The scanned checks, along withinformation input by the user, result in a plurality of exemplaryelectronic transaction files 906 a-e denoted as “A” to “E” that aretransmitted to the check processing service 104.

The check processing service 104, upon receipt of the plurality oftransaction files from the POS device 124, processes each of thetransactions via one or more of a plurality of processes 910 dependingon the check-type. The plurality of processes 910 is depicted ascomprising branching pathways representing various processes 912 a, b,etc.

FIGS. 26A-B illustrate processes representative of the check-typeselection configuration 900 described above in reference to FIG. 25.FIG. 26A illustrates a process 920 that can be implemented at the POSdevice, and FIG. 26B illustrates a process 940 that can be implementedat the check processing service.

As shown in FIG. 26A, the process 920 begins in a start state 922, andin step 924 that follows, the process 920 prompts the user to scan allchecks in a batch. In step 926 that follows, the process 920 inducesscanning of a check. In step 928 that follows, the process 920 inducesobtaining of input(s) related to the scanned check. In step 930 thatfollows, the process 920 generates an electronic file associated withthe scanned check and denotes the check-type of the scanned check. Instep 932 that follows, the process transmits the electronic file to thecheck processing service. In a decision step 934 that follows, theprocess 920 determines whether the batch scanning is done. If the answeris “no,” the process 920 loops back to step 926 to scan and processanother check. If the answer is “yes,” the process 920 ends in a stopstate 936.

As shown in FIG. 26B, the process 940 begins at a start state 942, andin step 944 that follows, the process 940 receives an electronic filefrom the merchant. In step 946 that follows, the process 940 determinesthe type of the check based on information in the electronic file. Instep 950 that follows, the process 940 induces further processing of theelectronic file according to the check-type determination. The process940 ends in a stop state 952.

FIGS. 27A-B illustrate more specific exemplary processes 960 and 990corresponding to the generalized processes 920 and 940 described abovein reference to FIGS. 26A-B. The exemplary processes 960 and 990 aredescribed in context of distinguishing the type of the check bydetermining whether the check is a personal check or a non-personalcheck. It will be appreciated, however, any other check types may beused to distinguish the checks without departing from the spirit of thepresent teachings. Furthermore, the use of the personal/non-personalcheck criteria is in no way intended to limit the scope of the presentteachings.

As shown in FIG. 27A, the process 960 begins at a start state 962, andin step 964 that follows, the process 960 prompts the user to scan allchecks in a batch. In step 966 that follows, the process 960 inducesscanning of a check. In step 970 that follows, the process 960 asks theuser whether the scanned check is a personal check. In a decision step972 that follows, the process 960 determines whether the scanned checkis a personal check. If the answer is “yes,” the process 960 in step 974tags the scanned check as a personal check. If the answer is “no,” theprocess 960 in step 976 tags the scanned check as a non-personal check.As shown in FIG. 27A, the process 960 in step 980 then generates anelectronic file for the scanned check, including the check-type tag. Instep 982 that follows, the process 960 buffers and/or transmits theelectronic file to the check processing service. In a decision step 984that follows, the process 960 determines whether the batch scanning isdone. If the answer is “no,” the process 960 loops back to step 966 toscan and process another check. If the answer is “yes,” the process 960ends at a stop state 986.

As shown in FIG. 27B, the process 990 begins at a start state 992, andin step 994 that follows, the process 990 receives an electronic filefrom the merchant. In step 996 that follows, the process 990 reads thecheck-type tag associated with the electronic file. In a decision step998 that follows, the process 990 determines whether the electronic filecorresponds to a personal check. If the answer is “yes,” the process 990in step 1000 induces further electronic processing of the file via theautomated clearing house (ACH). If the answer is “no,” the process 990in step 1002 induces printing of an image of the check from theelectronic file and further processing of the check image via thefederal clearing house (FCH). As shown in FIG. 27B, the process 990 thenends at a stop state 1004.

Although the above-disclosed embodiments of the present invention haveshown, described, and pointed out the fundamental novel features of theinvention as applied to the above-disclosed embodiments, it should beunderstood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in theform of the detail of the devices, systems, and/or methods illustratedmay be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scopeof the present invention. Consequently, the scope of the inventionshould not be limited to the foregoing description, but should bedefined by the appended claims.

All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specificationare indicative of the level of skill of those skilled in the art towhich this invention pertains. All publications and patent applicationsare herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if eachindividual publication or patent application was specifically andindividually indicated to be incorporated by reference.

1. A system for electronically processing a check transaction involvinga merchant, comprising: a point-of-sale device that receives user inputas to a check transaction type and electronically converts a check,wherein the point-of-sale device is capable of generating a receipt andincludes a plurality of stored receipt formats corresponding to one ormore check transaction factors associated with the check transactiontype including providing no receipt; a check processing service linkedto the point-of-sale device to receive information about the convertedcheck from the point-of-sale device and perform an authorization processon the check transaction such that the check processing service notifiesthe merchant via the point-of-sale device of an authorize or declinedecision of the authorization process; wherein the point-of-sale deviceautomatically determines, based on the check transaction type userinput, whether to generate a receipt by selecting a receipt format fromthe plurality of stored receipt formats corresponding to one or morecheck transaction factors associated with the check transaction type,wherein the point-of sale device generates a receipt if the checktransaction is authorized and involves a face-to-face-type transaction,and wherein the point-of-sale device does not generate a receipt if thecheck transaction involves an accounts receivable-type check transactioneven if the accounts receivable-type check transaction is authorized bythe check processing service.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein thepoint-of-sale device converts the check by scanning the check so as toread the check's magnetic ink character recognition line and obtain animage of at least a portion of the check.
 3. The system of claim 2,wherein the point-of-sale device facilitates the determination ofwhether the check is an accounts receivable check by having the merchantselect an option that allows processing of the accounts receivablecheck.
 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the authorization processincludes a risk assessment of the check transaction.
 5. The system ofclaim 1, wherein the check processing service performs the authorizationprocess and notifies the merchant of its decision in a manner thatdepends at least on a level of service subscribed by the merchantwherein the level of service includes the check processing serviceguaranteeing or purchasing check transactions it authorizes therebyassuming at least some of the risk associated with the check.
 6. Amethod for processing a check transaction via a point-of-sale deviceassociated with a merchant, the method comprising: receiving user inputas to a transaction type; converting a check associated with the checktransaction; selecting a receipt format from a plurality of storedreceipt formats wherein the plurality of stored receipt formatscorresponds to one or more check transaction factors associated with thecheck transaction tv e and includes no receipt; determining whether thecheck is an accounts receivable check based on the user input;communicating with a check processing service that determines whetherthe check transaction should be authorized or declined based at least oninformation obtained from conversion of the check; and determiningautomatically, based on the transaction type user input and the selectedreceipt format, whether to generate a receipt for the check transactionwherein the receipt is not generated if the check is an accountsreceivable check.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein converting the checkcomprises scanning the check so as to read the check's magnetic inkcharacter recognition line and obtain an image of at least a portion ofthe check.
 8. The method of claim 6, wherein determining whether thecheck is an accounts receivable check comprises providing the merchantwith an option to process the check as an accounts receivable check suchthat the merchant selecting the option is indicative that the check isan accounts receivable check.
 9. The method of claim 6, wherein thecheck processing service determines whether to authorize or decline thecheck transaction by performing a risk assessment of the checktransaction.
 10. The method of claim 6, wherein the check processingservice performs the authorization process and notifies the merchant ofits decision in a manner that depends at least on a level of servicesubscribed by the merchant wherein the level of service includes thecheek processing service guaranteeing or purchasing check transactionsit authorizes thereby assuming at least some of the risk associated withthe check.
 11. A system for conducting a financial transaction involvinga merchant, comprising: a location-base device that receives user inputas to whether the check transaction involves a face-to-face checktransaction or an accounts receivable check transaction and processesthe financial transaction, wherein the location-base device is capableof selecting a receipt format from a plurality of stored receipt formatscorresponding to one or more check transaction factors for the checktransaction, wherein the plurality of stored receipt formats includes noreceipt and generating a receipt associated with the financialtransaction; a financial transaction processing service linked to thelocation-base device to receive information about the financialtransaction and perform an authorization on the financial transaction;wherein the location-base device automatically determines not togenerate a receipt, based on the user input, if the financialtransaction occurs in a non-face-to-face manner even if the financialtransaction is authorized.
 12. The system of claim 11, wherein thefinancial transaction comprises a check transaction.
 13. The system ofclaim 12, wherein the location-base device comprises a point-of-saledevice.
 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the point-of-sale deviceconverts the check by scanning the check so as to read the check'smagnetic ink character recognition line and obtain an image of at leasta portion of the check.
 15. The system of claim 14, wherein thepoint-of-sale device facilitates the determination of whether the checktransaction occurred in a non-face-to-face manner by having the merchantselect an option that allows processing of non-face-to-face checktransactions.
 16. The system of claim 11, wherein the financialtransaction processing service comprises a check processing service. 17.The system of claim 16, wherein the check processing service'sperformance of the authorization includes a risk assessment of the checktransaction.
 18. The system of claim 16, wherein the check processingservice performs the authorization in a manner that depends at least ona level of service subscribed by the merchant wherein the level ofservice includes the check processing service guaranteeing or purchasingcheck transactions it authorizes thereby assuming at least some of therisk associated with the check.
 19. A method for processing a paymentmade to a merchant, the method comprising: convening the payment into anelectronic format that allows at least a portion of subsequent paymentprocessing to be performed electronically; receiving user input as to atransaction type; selecting a receipt format from a plurality of storedreceipt formats corresponding to one or more check transaction factorsfor the transaction type wherein the receipt format includes no receipt;and determining, based on the transaction type user input, whether thepayment involves a non-face-to-face transaction, wherein a receipt forthe payment is automatically not generated if the payment is anon-face-to-face transaction.
 20. The method of claim 19, wherein thepayment comprises a check.
 21. The method of claim 20, whereinconverting the check comprises scanning the check so as to read thecheck's magnetic ink character recognition line and obtain an image ofat least a portion of the check.
 22. The method of claim 20, whereindetermining whether the payment involves a face-to-face transactioncomprises providing an option for the merchant to select a configurationthat allows processing of non-face-to-face cheeks.
 23. The method ofclaim 19, further comprising communicating the electronic format of thepayment to a payment processing service that performs an authorizationprocess that includes a risk assessment.
 24. The method of claim 23,wherein the payment processing service comprises a check processingservice.
 25. A system for conducting a financial transaction involving amerchant, comprising: a first means for receiving user input as towhether the financial transaction involves a non-face-to-facetransaction; and a second means for selecting a receipt format from aplurality of stored receipt formats corresponding to one or more checktransaction factors wherein the plurality of stored receipt formatsincludes no receipt; and a third means for automatically determining notto generate a receipt if the financial transaction is a non-face-to-facetransaction even if the financial transaction is authorized.
 26. Thesystem of claim 25, wherein the financial transaction comprises a checktransaction.
 27. The system of claim 26, wherein the first meansincludes a point-of-sale device electronically converts a check byscanning the check so as to read the check's magnetic ink characterrecognition line and obtain an image of at least a portion of the check.28. The system of claim 27, wherein the third means includes an optionon the point-of sale device such that, when selected, configures thepoint-of-sale device for processing of non-face-to-face checktransactions.
 29. The system of claim 28, wherein the point-of-saledevice configured for processing non-face-to-face transactions does notgenerate a receipt.
 30. The system of claim 25, wherein the third meansfurther comprises having the financial transaction undergo anauthorization process that includes a risk assessment.
 31. The system ofclaim 1, wherein the point-of-sale device generates a receipt thatincludes warranty language in response to input from the checkprocessing service that the check transaction is guaranteed.